OPPT_1,4-Dioxane_D. Exposure

Project ID

2543

Category

OPPT REs

Added on

March 7, 2017, 3:17 p.m.

Search the HERO reference database

Query Builder

Search query
DOI
Journal Article

Abstract  1,4-Dioxane has been classified by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a compound that may be carcinogenic in humans. Although there are several reports of 1,4-dioxane being detected in the environment, such as in tap water, there have been few reports on the content of 1,4-dioxane in food. We therefore studied the intake of 1,4-dioxane in food based on the average intake of food in the Kanto area of Japan as reported by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. The food was cooked in the normal manner and then homogenized in a mixer. A 20 g of sample of the homogenate was added to a solution of the purified water with 0.2 μg of 1,4-dioxane-d_8 as a surrogate and the 200 ml azeotropic solution was recovered using the steam distillation method. This solution was applied to a pair of active carbon solid-phase cartridges and the analyte was eluted from each cartridge with dichloromethane. The eluted solution was prepared for gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis by reduction to a volume of 1 ml under a gentle stream of nitrogen. The detection limit of the analysis was 2 μg/kg. We found that the 1,4-dioxane content of 12 food groups ranged between 2 μg/kg and 15 μg/kg. From these results, the total daily intake of 1,4-dioxane was calculated to be 0.440 μg. An intake of this magnitude corresponds to 0.055% of the calculated total daily intake (TDI) (16 μg/kg body weight/day). This study indicates that the amount of 1,4-dioxane intake contributed by food is very low and that this value does not represent a potential problem as it does not raise the risk of carcinogenesis.

Journal Article

Abstract  Authentication of farm animal rearing conditions, especially the type of feeding, is a key issue in certification of meat quality and meat products. The purpose of this article was to analyze in parallel the volatile fraction of three adipose tissues excised from 16 lambs in order to authenticate two animal diets: pasture (n = 8) and concentrate (n = 8). On the basis of growth rate and anatomical location, three different lamb adipose tissues were analyzed: perirenal fat (PRF), caudal subcutaneous fat (CSCF), and heart fat (HF). An initial experiment was used to optimize the extraction of volatile compounds from the adipose tissues. Using a lipid liquid phase extraction, heating the ground tissue to 70 degrees C, was shown to be the best sample preparation mode before dynamic headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (DH-GC-MS) analysis to achieve a good representation of the starting material, while getting a good extraction and reproducibility. Next, the application of an instrumental drifts correction procedure to DH-GC-MS data enabled the identification of 130 volatile compounds that discriminate the two diets in one or several of the three tissues: 104 were found in PRF, 75 in CSCF, and 70 in HF. Forty-eight of these diet tracers, including 2,3-octanedione, toluene, terpenes, alkanes, alkenes, and ketones, had previously been identified as ruminant pasture-diet tracers and can be considered generic of this type of animal feeding. Moreover, 49 of the 130 compounds could identify diets in only one tissue, suggesting that complementary analysis of several tissues is superior for diet identification. Finally, multivariate discriminant analyses confirmed that the discrimination was improved when PRF, CSCF, and HF were considered simultaneously, even if HF contributed minimal information.

Journal Article

Abstract  The volatile and polar solvent 1,4-dioxane has recently been reported as a contaminant of ground and surface waters, establishing the need to determine this substance in drinking water. This investigation established that 1,4-dioxane can be determined in water by various techniques including direct aqueous injection (DAI) gas chromatography (GC) and purge and trap GC-mass spectrometry (MS). Purge and trap GC-MS is limited by 1,4-dioxane's poor purge efficiency, resulting in detection limits up to 100 times greater than the efficiently purged volatile organic compounds. To attain the sensitivity required for drinking water monitoring, a method based on continuous liquid-liquid extraction with dichloromethane was developed. Isotope dilution was more accurate and reproducible than quantification with external standards, and the improvement in precision led to a lower method detection limit, 0.2 mu g L-1, using a quadrupole ion trap instrument in the electron ionization mode. Isotope dilution accuracy approached 100% in ppb determinations. Isotopic dilution quantification was also possible using a non-selective GC detector owing to the high efficiency of capillary GC columns that resolve the deuterium-labeled solvent from the natural isotopes.

Journal Article

Abstract  1,4-Dioxane impurity in nonionic surfactants and cosmetics were analyzed using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Experimental results show that there is no significant difference using SPME-GC and SPME-GC-MS for analysis of 1,4-dioxane in three types of nonionic surfactants at the 95% confidence level. The relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) values of each analytical method were smaller than 3%. The amount of 1,4-dioxane was found to vary from 11.6 +/- 0.3 ppm to 73.5 +/- 0.5 ppm in 30% of nonionic surfactants from manufacturers in Taiwan. These methods were linear over the studied range of 3-150 ppm with correlation coefficients higher than 0.995. The recoveries of 1,4-dioxane for these nonionic surfactants following SPME were all higher than 96 +/- 1% (n = 3). The detection limits of 1,4-dioxane for these nonionic surfactants following SPME were from 0.06 ppm to 0.51 ppm. The experimentally determined level of 1,4-dioxane in cosmetics from manufacturers in Taiwan varied from 4.2 +/- 0.1 ppm to 41.1 +/- 0.6 ppm in 22% of daily used cosmetics following SPME coupled with GC and GC-MS. Conventional solvent extraction takes around 1 h for extraction and reconcentration but SPME takes only around 10 min. SPME provides better analyses of 1,4-dioxane in nonionic surfactants and cosmetics than conventional solvent extraction and head space pretreatments in term of simplicity, speed, precision, detection limit, and solvent consumption.

Filter Results