Size distribution of airborne particles controls outcome of epidemiological studies

Harrison, RM; Giorio, C; Beddows, DC; Dall'Osto, M

HERO ID

1075531

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year

2010

Language

English

PMID

21109288

HERO ID 1075531
In Press No
Year 2010
Title Size distribution of airborne particles controls outcome of epidemiological studies
Authors Harrison, RM; Giorio, C; Beddows, DC; Dall'Osto, M
Journal Science of the Total Environment
Volume 409
Issue 2
Page Numbers 289-293
Abstract Epidemiological studies typically using wide size range mass metrics (e.g. PM(10)) have demonstrated associations between airborne particulate matter and several adverse health outcomes. This approach ignores the fact that mass concentration may not correlate with regional lung dose, unlike the case of trace gases. When using measured particle size distributions as the basis for calculating regional lung dose, PM(10) mass concentration is found to be a good predictor of the mass dose in all regions of the lung, but is far less predictive of the surface area and particle number dose. On the other hand, measurements of particle number do not well predict mass dose, indicating that the chosen particle metric is likely to determine the health outcomes detectable by an epidemiological study. Consequently, epidemiological studies using mass metrics (PM(2.5) and PM(10)) may fail to recognise important health consequences of particulate matter exposure, leading to an underestimate of the public health consequences of particle exposure.
Doi 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.09.043
Pmid 21109288
Wosid WOS:000286294300006
Is Certified Translation No
Dupe Override No
Is Public Yes
Language Text English
Keyword Airborne particulate matter; PM(10); PM(2.5); Particle number count; Health effects; Epidemiology
Is Qa No