Implications of geographic variability on Comparative Toxicity Potentials of Cu, Ni and Zn in freshwaters of Canadian ecoregions

Gandhi, N; Huijbregts, MA; Meent, Dv; Peijnenburg, WJ; Guinée, J; Diamond, ML

HERO ID

1791498

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year

2011

Language

English

PMID

20934738

HERO ID 1791498
In Press No
Year 2011
Title Implications of geographic variability on Comparative Toxicity Potentials of Cu, Ni and Zn in freshwaters of Canadian ecoregions
Authors Gandhi, N; Huijbregts, MA; Meent, Dv; Peijnenburg, WJ; Guinée, J; Diamond, ML
Journal Chemosphere
Volume 82
Issue 2
Page Numbers 268-277
Abstract Current methods of estimating potential environmental impacts of metals in hazard and Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) do not consider differences in chemistry and landscape properties between geographic sites. Here, we developed and applied a model for regional aquatic impact characterization of metals using an updated method for estimating environmental fate factor (FF), bioavailability factor (BF) and aquatic ecotoxicity factor (EF). We applied the model to analyze differences in Comparative Toxicity Potentials (CTPs) of Cu, Ni and Zn for 24 Canadian ecoregions. The combined impacts of regional variability in ambient chemistry (in particular DOC, pH and hardness) and landscape properties (water residence time) can change the CTPs of these metals for freshwater by up to three orders of magnitude and change the relative ranking of metal hazard between ecoregions. Variation among Canadian freshwater chemistries and landscape characteristics influence the FFs within two orders of magnitude, BFs within two orders of magnitude for Ni and Zn and four orders of magnitude for Cu, and EFs within one order of magnitude. Sensitivity of metal FFs to environmental parameters alone spans three orders of magnitude when a constant water chemistry was used for all ecoregions. These results indicate that application of regionalised metal CTPs can have a significant influence in the analysis of ecotoxicological impacts in the life cycle assessment of products and processes.
Doi 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.046
Pmid 20934738
Wosid WOS:000285674400018
Is Certified Translation No
Dupe Override No
Is Public Yes
Language Text English
Keyword Metals; Life Cycle Impact Assessment; Comparative Toxicity Potential; Ecoregions; Speciation; Aquatic ecotoxicity