Performance of a passive electret dosimeter for Rn progeny

Khan, A; Phillips, CR

HERO ID

21360

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year

1985

HERO ID 21360
In Press No
Year 1985
Title Performance of a passive electret dosimeter for Rn progeny
Authors Khan, A; Phillips, CR
Journal Health Physics
Volume 49
Issue 5
Page Numbers 986-991
Abstract The performance of a passive electret dosimeter in measuring radon (10043922) progeny in the laboratory and in a uranium (7440611) mine was evaluated. The dosimeter head was modified to suit the requirements for aerosol collection by electrostatic diffusion. The 6 millimeter gap between the collimators and the collecting surface in the dosimeter was preserved by replacing the filter in the dosimeter by the electret. The dosimeter was exposed inside a wind tunnel in a radon chamber at about 4 working stages for 2 hours. The electret dosimeter design was then adopted for a 1 week test in a uranium mine. The uranium mine used for testing was diesel operated and contained aerosols at concentrations in the range of 200,000 to 300,000 per cubic meter. Miners wore the passive dosimeter in addition to the reference dosimeter in the mines while working for 3 or 4 day periods. Passive dosimeter data was somewhat lower than that obtained from the reference dosimeters. The passive dosimeters were rugged enough for use in the mine atmosphere and no part of the electret dosimeters suffered any physical damage in the mine tests. The authors conclude that the high aerosol concentrations may have contributed to the efficiency of the dosimeter by a factor of 3 to 4 below what would have been expected based on preliminary laboratory work at lower aerosol concentrations.
Is Certified Translation No
Dupe Override No
Comments Health Phys. 49: 986-991.
Is Public Yes
Keyword <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>DCN-142552</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Laboratory equipment</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Analytical instruments</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Monitoring systems</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Mine workers</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Electronic equipment</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Mining equipment</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Laboratory techniques</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Clinical chemistry</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Quantitative analysis</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Analytical models</kw>; <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><kw>Monitors</kw>
Is Qa No