Consumer segmentation based on the level and structure of fruit and vegetable intake: an empirical evidence for US adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006

Demydas, T

HERO ID

5897968

Reference Type

Journal Article

Year

2011

Language

English

PMID

21272424

HERO ID 5897968
In Press No
Year 2011
Title Consumer segmentation based on the level and structure of fruit and vegetable intake: an empirical evidence for US adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006
Authors Demydas, T
Journal Public Health Nutrition
Volume 14
Issue 6
Page Numbers 1088-1095
Abstract <strong>OBJECTIVE: </strong>To identify consumption patterns of fruit and vegetables within a representative sample of US adults with a focus on degree of produce processing and to explore sociodemographic, lifestyle and nutritional profiles associated with these patterns.<br /><br /><strong>DESIGN: </strong>Cross-sectional analysis. Fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption data were collected using two non-consecutive 24 h recalls. For the purpose of the study, F&V intakes were aggregated into seven subgroups indicating degree of processing, which afterwards were used as inputs into cluster analysis.<br /><br /><strong>SETTING: </strong>The 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.<br /><br /><strong>SUBJECTS: </strong>The sample consisted of 2444 adults aged 20-59 years.<br /><br /><strong>RESULTS: </strong>Total average F&V intake of the adults was below the recommended level. Thereby, 20 % of the respondents consumed fruit only in the form of juice. Three F&V consumption patterns were identified: 'low-intake F&V consumers' (74 % of respondents), 'consumers of healthier F&V options' (13 %) and 'intensive fruit juice consumers' (13 %). These groups differed markedly in terms of their sociodemographic, lifestyle and health characteristics, such as gender, age, race/ethnicity, education, smoking, weight status, etc. Differences in nutrient profiles were also found, with the 'consumers of healthier F&V options' showing better nutritional quality compared with other clusters.<br /><br /><strong>CONCLUSIONS: </strong>Only a small share of US adults combines high F&V intakes with healthier F&V options that lead to a better nutritional profile. This raises discussion about a need to deliver more specific F&V promotion messages, including advice on healthier preparation methods, especially for the specific population groups.
Doi 10.1017/S1368980010003745
Pmid 21272424
Wosid WOS:000290530400021
Is Certified Translation No
Dupe Override No
Is Public Yes
Language Text English