Evaluation of the implementation of asbestos operations and maintenance programs in New Jersey schools
Kominsky, J; Freyberg, R; Gerber, D; Centifonti, G; Brownlee, J; Clark, P; Edwards, A; Wilmoth, R
| HERO ID | 82520 |
|---|---|
| In Press | No |
| Year | 1996 |
| Title | Evaluation of the implementation of asbestos operations and maintenance programs in New Jersey schools |
| Authors | Kominsky, J; Freyberg, R; Gerber, D; Centifonti, G; Brownlee, J; Clark, P; Edwards, A; Wilmoth, R |
| Journal | AIHA Journal |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Page Numbers | 1065-1068 |
| Abstract | Steps taken to implement an asbestos (1332214) operations and maintenance (O) program in New Jersey schools were evaluated. The program utilized appropriate work practices and training to maintain friable asbestos containing materials (ACM) in good condition, ensure proper cleanup of previously released asbestos fibers, and prevent future releases by minimizing and controlling the distribution of ACM during installation, repair, maintenance, and cleaning activities. The program was evaluated at eight schools in New Jersey where O/M activities were in progress or planned. The evaluation was conducted in three phases: a review of each school's program, which was on file with the New Jersey Department of Health; an interview with each school's designated AHERA person to obtain information on the type and location of each O/M activity; and observation and documentation of selected O/M activities involving ACM. Personal air monitoring for asbestos during selected O/M activities was also performed. The samples were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and phase contrast microscopy (PCM). The schools were found not to be implementing all of the elements of the O/M program. Across the eight schools, the percentage performance responses decreased from phase 1 to phase 3. The overall comprehensiveness of the schools' O/M programs varied from 45.9% to 83.8%, average 70.6%. The overall percentage performance responses of the school officials averaged only 52.5%. All elements of the programs were not communicated to the schools' designated AHERA person or the maintenance personnel or outside contractors performing the work. The average percentage performance responses of school maintenance personnel or outside contractors performing the work was only 35% and 22.5%, respectively. TEM showed that O/M activities frequently led to increases in personal air asbestos fiber concentrations above 0.02 seconds per cubic meter, an exposure limit derived from AHERA clearance criteria. PCM found no asbestos fiber concentrations in excess of the OSHA 8 hour time weighted average standard of 0.1 fiber per centimeter. The authors conclude that the selected schools are not currently completely implementing the O/M program. |
| Is Certified Translation | No |
| Dupe Override | No |
| Comments | Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 57: 1065-1068. |
| Is Public | Yes |
| Is Qa | No |